Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 2985/1998 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court clarifies distinction between murder and aggravated assault with intent to kill in Finnish criminal law.

Numero d'incarto KKO 2985/1998
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Finland addressed whether the defendant's actions constituted murder or aggravated assault with intent to kill. The court examined the specific intent and circumstances surrounding the act to determine the correct legal classification. It ruled that the distinction depends on whether the perpetrator aimed to deprive the victim of life or merely cause severe harm.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Section 6 of the Penal Code; Section 10 of the Penal Code: The court established that the intent to kill must be proven to distinguish murder from aggravated assault with intent to kill, requiring clear evidence of the specific purpose to end the victim's life.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
murder vs aggravated assault intent to kill criminal classification Finnish Penal Code subjective intent vittima di infortunio responsabilità dell'assicuratore infortuni causalità del colpo di frusta

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Section 6 of the Penal Code
Section 10 of the Penal Code
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_2004_106
Supreme Court of Finland increases sentence from fine to conditional prison for unprovoked street assault on three victims.
kko-precedent_2002_124
Supreme Court convicted defendant of murder and ordered higher damages for sister than father due to closeness.
appeal_1983_rovaniemi__1298
Excessive defense justified by necessity but deemed disproportionate and unnecessary, resulting in full criminal liability.
kko-precedent_2005_63
Attempted murder charge dismissed; defendant voluntarily called ambulance after second request, preventing death.
kko-precedent_2014_97
Supreme Court allows delayed career loss damages for injury victims whose professional training was postponed by the tortfeasor.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Kysymys siitä, oliko vastaajan syyksi luettu teko tappo vai törkeä pahoinpitely ja törkeä kuolemantuottamus.