Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 2811/1998 Generato dall'IA

Court held that a third-party buyer of business assets is liable for restitution under bankruptcy law when funds were diverted to a third party.

Numero d'incarto KKO 2811/1998
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court ruled that company B was liable for restitution to company A's bankruptcy estate alongside the original debtor. Although B had purchased the business assets from A after A's insolvency, the court found that B had received funds diverted by a third party from A's creditors. Consequently, the court determined B must return the assets to the bankruptcy estate to satisfy A's creditors.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Laki 1093/1991 20 §; A third-party purchaser of business assets is liable for restitution to the bankruptcy estate if the assets were acquired using funds improperly diverted from the original debtor's creditors.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
bankruptcy restitution third party liability business asset transfer insolvency law creditor rights causa di carattere pecuniario retrocessione di credito restitutio in integrum

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Laki 1093/1991 20 §
Generato dall'IA
kko-other_1999_262
Supreme Court rules that a bankruptcy trustee must return excess payments made to a creditor in a resale case.
kko-precedent_1988_111
Supreme Court dismisses appeal when bankruptcy administrator accepts full payment from debtor, preventing funds from joining the bankruptcy estate.
kko-precedent_1989_27
Supreme Court allows debt transfer as substitute performance under Bankruptcy Act 46 § d.
kko-other_2013_694
Supreme Court dismissed creditor's appeal regarding right to drive seized funds and documents.
kko-precedent_1999_21
Supreme Court allows full recovery of debt from creditor under bankruptcy recovery law despite creditor's lack of knowledge of debtor's insolvency.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Yhtiö A oli myynyt läheisyhtiölleen B:lle liikeomaisuutensa. Saamallaan kauppahinnalla A oli maksanut velkojaan läheisyhtiölleen kommandiittiyhtiö C:lle, jonka vastuunalainen yhtiömies oli välittömästi siirtänyt rahat C:n tililtä B:n pankkitilille. B oli A:n jouduttua konkurssiin runsaan vuoden kuluttua myynyt koko liikeomaisuutensa läheisyhtiölleen D:lle.

Kysymys siitä, oliko D takaisinsaannista konkurssipesään annetun lain 20 §:n nojalla palautusvelvollisen B:n ohella vastuussa varojen palauttamisesta A:n konkurssipesälle.