Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 2807/1998 Generato dall'IA

Work accident compensation allowed for fall on bicycle causing shoulder injury during business trip.

Numero d'incarto KKO 2807/1998
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Finland allowed the employee's claim for work accident compensation regarding a shoulder injury sustained during a business trip. The employee fell off a bicycle while on a work assignment and suffered a shoulder injury requiring surgical treatment. The court determined that the injury was a direct consequence of the work-related accident and thus compensable under the relevant liability rules.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Work Accident Liability Act; Workmen's Compensation Act: An injury sustained during a business trip, such as falling from a bicycle, is considered a work accident if it occurs within the scope of employment duties, entitling the employee to compensation for necessary medical treatment.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
work accident compensation business trip injury workmen's liability employee injury claim work accident Act perizia medica superata incapacità lavorativa attestata accertamento medico complementare

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Work Accident Liability Act
Workmen's Compensation Act
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_2013_8
Supreme Court allows worker's compensation for frozen shoulder caused by a 2008 workplace accident due to clear causal link.
insurance_1978_2413-1977
Insurance court dismissed claim for shoulder inflammation compensation when injury was deemed unrelated to work accident.
kko-other_2008_439
Supreme Court dismissed claim for work injury compensation due to lack of causal link between pre-existing conditions and accident.
kko-other_1998_570
Workplace injury claim dismissed as employee failed to prove causal link between lifting and injury.
kko-other_1998_569
Work accident claim dismissed because injury occurred during leisure time, not work duties.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Työntekijä oli työmatkallaan kaatunut polkupyörällä ja lyönyt vasemman olkapäänsä jäiseen maahan. Työntekijän (41 vuotta) leikkaushoitoa vaatineet olkapään vaivat katsottiin sanotun tapaturman korvattaviksi seurauksiksi.