Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
KKO 2698/1998 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismissed appeal where land court wrongly ordered compensation for private information disclosure without prior notice to the affected party.

Numero d'incarto KKO 2698/1998
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against the Land Court's decision to order compensation for significant harm caused by a private information disclosure. The Land Court had found that the disclosure caused substantial damage to the property, but the affected party had not been given an opportunity to respond to the appeal before the main proceedings concluded. The Court ruled that the Land Court's procedure was flawed because it failed to ensure the affected party could participate in the appeal process prior to the final decision.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Section 10 of the Administrative Justice Act; Section 2 of the Land Court Act: The administrative court must ensure the affected party has the opportunity to respond to the appeal before making a final decision on the merits of the case.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
administrative procedure right to respond land court jurisdiction private information disclosure procedural fairness giudizio sul merito della causa restitutio in integrum restituzioni alla produzione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Section 10 of the Administrative Justice Act
Section 2 of the Land Court Act
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Maaoikeus katsoi, että yksityistietoimituksessa määrätystä tieoikeudesta aiheutui kiinteistölle huomattavaa haittaa, ja palautti asian uuteen toimitukseen. Toimituksen asianosaista, jonka oikeutta muutoksenhakemus koski, ei ollut jo ennen pääkäsittelyä kehotettu vastaamaan muutoksenhakemukseen. Kysymys maaoikeuden menettelyn oikeellisuudesta.