Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 230/1998 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding failure to summon witnesses in criminal trial and reduction of sentence to fine.

Numero d'incarto KKO 230/1998
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the defendant's appeal against the High Court's decision to proceed without a public hearing and reduce the sentence to a fine. The defendant had requested the oral examination of two witnesses but failed to appear in court without legal representation. The court ruled that the procedural defect did not justify overturning the lower court's judgment or the sentence reduction.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Laki rikosasioista 379/1989; Rikoslaki 40. a.l. Korkein oikeus on toiminut oikein, kun se on hylkännyt valituksen hovioikeuden päätöksestä, jossa se jätti asian käsittelyssä suullista käsittelyä todistajien kuulemiseksi ilman, että vastaaja oli esillä avustajansa puolesta, ja tuomitsi vastaajan sakkorangaistukseen.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
criminal procedure oral hearing requirement witness examination legal representation sentence reduction appeal dismissal procedural defect allegazione motivata

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Laki rikosasioista 379/1989
Rikoslaki 40. a.l.
Generato dall'IA
appeal_1985_rovaniemi__1096
Court dismisses appeal for oral hearing, ruling it unnecessary given existing evidence for conviction.
kko-other_2006_732
Supreme Court held that lower courts must organize a main hearing in robbery cases to ensure procedural fairness.
kko-precedent_2002_15
Supreme Court dismisses appeal when appellate court increases sentence and oral hearing is clearly unnecessary.
kko-other_2023_296
Supreme Court held that lower courts must transfer cases of serious assault to the main hearing court.
kko-other_2008_2235
Supreme Court held lower court must submit case to main hearing in murder proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Ilman avustajaa alioikeudessa esiintynyt vastaaja A oli siellä tuomittu vankeusrangaistukseen pahoinpitelystä. A oli hovioikeudessa pyytänyt kahden todistajan kuulemista suullisessa käsittelyssä. Hovioikeus ratkaisi jutun toimittamatta asiassa suullista käsittelyä A:n nimeämien todistajien kuulemiseksi alentaen samalla A:lle tuomitun vankeusrangaistuksen sakkorangaistukseksi. Kysymys hovioikeuden menettelyn oikeellisuudesta.