Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 1714/1998 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses claim for damages where buyer failed to notify defects within the statutory limitation period.

Numero d'incarto KKO 1714/1998
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the buyer's claim for damages regarding defective insulators supplied between 1979 and 1984. Although the buyer identified defects in 1984 and formally requested compensation in 1991, the court found the claim time-barred under the applicable limitation rules. The decision rests on the principle that the limitation period for such claims had expired before the formal demand was made.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Limitation Act 1973; Limitation Act 1973: A claim for damages is barred if the limitation period expires before the creditor formally demands performance, even if the defect was discovered later.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
statutory limitation period defective products liability failure to notify time bar defense consumer protection law disturbo elettromagnetico revoca dell'aiuto d'emergenza revoca del credito al consumo

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Limitation Act 1973
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_1989_83
Supreme Court dismisses water damage claim as statute of limitations expired upon work completion, not notification.
kko-precedent_1993_159
Supreme Court allows guarantor liability when debt restructuring extends maturity date within guarantee clause.
insurance_1977_6687-1976
Insurance court dismisses claim where late notice caused by minor's age lacks serious reasons.
insurance_1976_3782-1976
Insurance court dismissed late claim due to lack of valid reasons for over six-year delay.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2019:94
Supreme Court holds that a timely notice of defect fulfilled the warranty obligation, preventing loss of claim rights despite delayed formal demands.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Myyjä oli vuosina 1979-1984 toimittanut sähkölaitokselle eristimiä, jotka oli asennettu sähkölaitoksen sähköverkkoon. Eristimissä ilmeni vuonna 1984 vikoja, joista huomautettiin myyjälle. Sähkölaitos esitti vuonna 1991, sähkötarkastuskeskuksen määrättyä eristimet poistettaviksi, yksilöidyn korvausvaatimuksen myyjälle. Kysymys siitä, oliko ostaja reklamoinut ja esittänyt korvausvaatimuksensa ajoissa ja oliko vahingonkorvausvaatimus vanhentunut.