Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 895/1997 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows appeal on new evidence and corrects debt restructuring procedure for creditor non-hearing.

Numero d'incarto KKO 895/1997
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Finland allowed the appellant's right to submit additional evidence and arguments at the court of appeal beyond those presented at the district court. The lower court's procedure was deemed flawed because the proposed payment plan was finalized without hearing the creditor, violating procedural fairness. Consequently, the appeal was granted to address these procedural defects and the exclusion of relevant evidence.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Korkein oikeus 1997:23; The right to appeal on new grounds and evidence exists; the court must correct procedural errors where a creditor was not heard before a payment plan was finalized.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
debt restructuring procedure creditor non-hearing payment plan proposal new evidence appeal procedural fairness motivazione del mutamento giurisprudenza modificazione delle conclusioni modifica di misure cautelari

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
KKO 1997:23
Generato dall'IA
kko-other_2003_2714
Supreme Court held that a lower court's decision on debt restructuring proceedings remains binding in subsequent proceedings.
kko-other_2003_1048
Supreme Court allows appeal to new evidence in debt restructuring cases beyond first-instance submissions.
kko-precedent_1997_109
Supreme Court dismisses appeal where creditor fails to raise debt restructuring objections in lower court.
kko-precedent_1997_18
Supreme Court allows debt restructuring to remain effective while suspending the court's ruling on the payment plan.
kko-precedent_1997_23
Bank appeal dismissed; debt adjustment applicant cannot raise new evidence in appeal court.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Kysymys yksityishenkilön velkajärjestelyä koskevassa hakemusasiassa valittajan oikeudesta vedota hovioikeudessa muihin seikkoihin ja todisteisiin kuin niihin, jotka oli esitetty alioikeudessa.

Ks. KKO:1997:23

Kysymys myös käräjäoikeuden menettelyn oikeellisuudesta, kun selvittäjän laatimaa maksuohjelmaehdotusta oli ennen sen vahvistamista muutettu velkojaa kuulematta.