Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 3455/1997 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal when judge handling return of judgment was previously involved in original case.

Numero d'incarto KKO 3455/1997
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal because the same judge who decided the original debt collection case was also handling the return of judgment proceedings. The court found this created a conflict of interest since the initial decision relied on both substantive and procedural facts. Consequently, the judge was deemed biased and the proceedings were invalid.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Korkein oikeus 10.10.1997 KKO 3455/1997: If the same judge who decided the original case is handling the return of judgment, the judge is considered biased and the proceedings are invalid.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
conflict of interest return of judgment judicial bias debt collection proceedings same judge error riesame da parte dell'assicuratore giudizio sul merito della causa riconsiderazione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Korkein oikeus 10.10.1997 KKO 3455/1997
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_1997_175
Supreme Court allows appeal against default judgment by ruling judge not biased in retrial.
kko-precedent_1997_102
Supreme Court finds judge biased for hearing retrial after previously deciding case unilaterally on same grounds.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2023:82
Supreme Court quarts lower court verdicts due to an ineligible judge lacking required security bond.
kko-precedent_2005_90
Supreme Court rules judge barred from retrial due to prior binding decision on same facts creating bias.
kko-precedent_1999_100
Supreme Court remands debt relief case to lower court to consider new grounds with prior facts as a whole.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Käräjätuomari oli käräjäoikeudessa ratkaissut velkomisasian päätöksellä, joka oli perustunut aineellisiin eikä pelkästään menettelyyn liittyviin seikkoihin. Hovioikeuden katsottua kantelun johdosta, että asia olisi tullut ratkaista yksipuolisella tuomiolla ja annettua takaisinsaantiosoituksen käräjäoikeuteen, takaisinsaantiasian käräjäoikeudessa käsitteli ja ratkaisi sama käräjätuomari. Käräjätuomari oli esteellinen takaisinsaantiasiaa käsiteltäessä.