Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 2013/1997 Generato dall'IA

Landlord may terminate lease for tenant's repeated parking violations of company rules.

Numero d'incarto KKO 2013/1997
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Finland allowed the landlord to terminate the lease due to the tenant's persistent violation of parking regulations. The tenant had repeatedly parked on a prohibited lawn area despite the housing company's explicit order to comply with the parking rules. The court ruled that such repeated breaches of the company's parking order constituted a valid ground for terminating the lease agreement.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

HVL 53 § 3; A landlord may terminate a lease agreement if the tenant repeatedly violates the housing company's parking regulations without justification.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
lease termination parking regulations housing company rules repeated violation tenant breach azienda principale nell'assicurazione infortuni infrazione commessa nell'azienda reati contro la sicurezza dei rapporti giuridici

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
HVL 53 § 3
HVL 53 § 3 kohta (653/87)

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
KKO:1997:85
Tenant's intentional parking violation on common area constitutes serious breach allowing landlord to terminate lease.
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_1997_85
Tenant's intentional parking violation on common area constitutes serious breach allowing landlord to terminate lease.
admin_2019_helsinki__339
Court ruled lease and sales agreement constitute a single sale for VAT purposes under EU Directive.
appeal_1974_helsinki__105
Court dismissed tenant eviction claim because landlord failed to prove specific building portion needed for their own residence.
appeal_1976_helsinki__93
Landlord's appeal dismissed; tenant failed to prove landlord needed unit for employee housing.
appeal_1975_helsinki__130
Tenant's eviction claim dismissed for lack of evidence on necessity and breach of lease terms.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Vuokralaiset olivat kieltäytyneet noudattamasta kiinteistöosakeyhtiön pysäköintiä koskevaa järjestyssääntöjen määräystä ja pysäköineet jatkuvasti kielletyllä pihaalueella. - Kysymys siitä, oliko yhtiöllä tämän vuoksi oikeus irtisanoa vuokrasopimus.

Ks. KKO:1997:85

HVL 53 § 3 kohta (653/87)