Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 1823/1997 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court held that a spouse's life tenancy on a gifted house is not a debtor's home under bankruptcy law.

Numero d'incarto KKO 1823/1997
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the claim that a life tenancy held by a spouse on a gifted property constituted a debtor's home under bankruptcy law. The court found that the tenancy was a security interest for a mortgage debt rather than a primary residence owned by the debtor. Consequently, the property was excluded from the definition of a debtor's home for bankruptcy proceedings.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

VJL 3 § 1 mom 5 kohta; VJL 3 § 1 mom 8 kohta: A life tenancy held by a spouse on a gifted property, serving as security for a mortgage, does not qualify as a debtor's home under bankruptcy legislation.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
bankruptcy law debtor's home life tenancy spousal rights mortgage security property ownership gifted real estate asilo di famiglia

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
VJL 3 § 1 mom 5 kohta
VJL 3 § 1 mom 8 kohta

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
KKO:1997:71
Supreme Court dismisses debt relief plan for spouses when child owns mortgaged property used as family home.
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_1997_71
Supreme Court dismisses debt relief plan for spouses when child owns mortgaged property used as family home.
insurance_2007_7891-2005
Student's right to housing allowance requires proof of actual costs, not a formal lease.
kko-precedent_2001_23
Supreme Court allows debt arrangement costs for cohabitant's mortgage only if actual contribution or necessity is proven.
kho-precedent_1998_81
Inheritance tax deduction denied for life tenancy retained by donor despite marital relationship.
kko-precedent_1992_168
Supreme Court dismisses wife's claim against husband's creditors regarding hidden joint ownership of property.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Velallisina olevat aviopuolisot hallitsivat alaikäiselle lapselleen lahjoittamallaan kiinteistöllä ollutta asuinrakennusta pidättämänsä elinikäisen asumisoikeuden nojalla. Kysymys siitä, voitiinko kiinteistöä pitää aviopuolisoiden yksityishenkilön velkajärjestelystä annetun lain 3 §:n 8 kohdassa tarkoitettuna velallisen omistusasuntona ja tähän kiinteistöön kohdistuvia panttivelkoja lain 3 §:n 5 kohdassa tarkoitettuina vakuusvelkoina.

Ks. KKO:1997:71

VJL 3 § 1 mom 5 kohta

VJL 3 § 1 mom 8 kohta