Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 1490/1997 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses claim that business transfer occurred under Labor Code 7 § 2 due to employer insolvency and partial asset transfer.

Numero d'incarto KKO 1490/1997
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the claim regarding a business transfer under Labor Code 7 § 2. The employer, facing financial difficulties, attempted to negotiate changes to working hours and wages before terminating contracts and transferring maintenance operations to a commandite company owned by an employee. The court found that the transfer of only partial operations and the continuation of business by the new entity did not constitute a full business transfer requiring liability for damages.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Työsopimuslaki 7 § 2 momentti; Liikkeen luovutus vaatii liikkeen kokonaisuuden siirtymisen, ei osittaisen toiminnan siirtymisen tai omistajan taloudellisten vaikeuksien vuoksi tapahtunutta toiminnan siirtymistä.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
business transfer labor code partial transfer employer insolvency damages liability commandite company employee ownership azienda principale nell'assicurazione infortuni

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Työsopimuslaki 7 § 2 momentti
Generato dall'IA
kko-other_1997_1492
Supreme Court dismisses claim that business transfer occurred under Labor Code 7.2 when employer sold business to related party.
kko-precedent_1999_71
Supreme Court dismisses wrongful dismissal claim where employee refused transfer to successor company under collective agreement terms.
labour_1986_25
Employer must offer rehire to laid-off worker if new staff hired during notice period lacked necessary skills.
labour_1986_22
Labor court dismisses claim that economic reasons for job elimination were a pretext for personal dismissal. Dismissed
kko-precedent_1997_105
Supreme Court dismisses claim that unlawful termination due to business transfer violates employee rights under Labor Code.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Taloudellisissa vaikeuksissa ollut autoliike oli tuloksetta neuvotellut työntekijöidensä kanssa työaikojen muuttamisesta ja palkkojen alentamisesta sekä tämän jälkeen irtisanonut työntekijöiden työsopimukset ja siirtänyt huolto- ja korjaamotoiminnan kommandiittiyhtiölle, jonka vastuunalainen yhtiömies oli autoliikkeen osakkeenomistaja ja hallituksen jäsen. Kommandiittiyhtiö oli jatkanut toimintaa samoissa tiloissa ja samoilla välineillä sekä osittain samalla henkilökunnalla.

Kysymys siitä, oliko tapahtunut työsopimuslain 7 §:n 2 momentissa tarkoitettu liikkeen luovutus, ja vahingonkorvausvelvollisuudesta. Ks. S-95/1084