Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 5006/1996 Generato dall'IA

Criminal penalty claim dismissed; case remitted for new investigation after witness information arrived post-judgment.

Numero d'incarto KKO 5006/1996
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the criminal penalty claim and remitted the case to the lower court for a new investigation. The respondent received information about a witness to a car collision only after the lower court's judgment was issued. Consequently, the court ordered the case to be returned to the district court to present this new evidence.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

OK 17 luku 11 § 3 mom: When new evidence regarding a witness emerges after a judgment is rendered, the case must be remitted to the lower court for a new investigation to ensure a fair trial.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
criminal penalty claim new evidence discovery case remittal post-judgment information witness testimony fair trial principle investigation procedure riapertura dell'istruttoria

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
OK 17 luku 11 § 3 mom
Generato dall'IA
appeal_1985_rovaniemi__1096
Court dismisses appeal for oral hearing, ruling it unnecessary given existing evidence for conviction.
appeal_1980_eastern-finland__624
Appeal court upheld right to appeal even if sentence is not heavier than previous decision.
kko-precedent_1996_139
Supreme Court allows appeal on secondary charge despite prosecutor not initially requesting it in response.
kko-precedent_1995_79
Supreme Court dismisses appeal where lower court relied on new evidence without requesting defendant's response.
kko-precedent_2011_109
Supreme Court allows reformatio in peius in retrial after extraordinary appeal due to judge disqualification.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rangaistusvaatimukset liikennerikosjutussa oli hylätty. Vastaaja oli vasta hovioikeuden tuomion antamisen jälkeen saanut tiedon eräästä autojen yhteentörmäyksen nähneestä henkilöstä. Juttu palautettiin alioikeuteen uuden selvityksen esittämistä varten.

OK 17 luku 11 § 3 mom