Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
KKO 4872/1996 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses claim for occupational disease compensation for tendonitis due to increased workload and new technology.

Numero d'incarto KKO 4872/1996
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the employee's claim for occupational disease compensation regarding her right wrist tendonitis. The employee argued that her condition was caused by increased workload and the introduction of new office technology, while the employer contended the injury was pre-existing or unrelated to work duties. The court ruled that the causal link between the specific work changes and the medical diagnosis was not sufficiently established to qualify as an occupational disease.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Lain 1346/1982 1 luku 10 a luku 1; 1 luku 10 b luku 1: The court found that the claimed occupational disease was not caused by the specific work-related factors alleged, thus denying compensation eligibility.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
occupational disease compensation tendonitis causation workload increase office technology impact Supreme Court dismissal medical evidence standard employee liability medicina del lavoro

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Lain 1346/1982 1 luku 10 a luku 1
Lain 1346/1982 1 luku 10 b luku 1
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Pääte- ja tekstinkäsittelyä tehnyt toimistopäällikkö oli joutunut lisäämään työpanostaan konekirjoittajan sairastumisen ja uuden toimistotekniikan käyttöönoton vuoksi. Kysymys siitä, oliko hänellä todettu oikean ranteen jännetulehdus/jännetupentulehdus ja rannekanavaoireyhtymä katsottava korvattavaksi ammattitaudiksi.