Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 4806/1996 Generato dall'IA

Suspension of investigation for potential new evidence does not bar state compensation claim for wrongful detention.

Numero d'incarto KKO 4806/1996
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court allowed the applicant's claim for state compensation regarding wrongful detention. The investigation was suspended solely to preserve the possibility of discovering new evidence supporting the suspect's guilt later. The court ruled that this procedural suspension did not constitute a bar to the applicant's right to seek compensation under the relevant state liability law.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Act on State Liability for Loss of Freedom; A suspension of criminal investigation for potential future evidence does not preclude a claim for state compensation for wrongful detention.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
state liability wrongful detention criminal investigation suspension state compensation procedural bar riapertura dell'istruttoria diritto a un'inchiesta effettiva spese per le indagini

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Act on State Liability for Loss of Freedom
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_1993_156
Supreme Court allows partial compensation for wrongful detention where suspect did not obstruct investigation.
insurance_2005_4915-2004
False report claim dismissed; indirect liberty loss insufficient for criminal compensation under Finnish law.
kko-precedent_1996_146
Supreme Court allows compensation claim for wrongful detention when investigation is de facto terminated without charges.
kko-precedent_2006_94
Supreme Court held criminal trial costs assessment must follow civil principles, not legal aid fee schedules.
kko-precedent_1993_63
Supreme Court dismisses compensation claim where suspect's silence on crime details did not obstruct investigation.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Esitutkinta oli keskeytetty vain sen varalta, että myöhemmin mahdollisesti ilmaantuisi uusia todisteita epäillyn A:n syyllisyyden tueksi. Kysymys A:n oikeudesta saada valtiolta korvausta syyttömästi vangitulle tai tuomitulle valtion varoista vapauden menetyksen johdosta maksettavasta korvauksesta annetun lain nojalla.