Employer dismissed claim regarding client's dismissal due to insufficient skills versus client's argument about client's requirement for new worker.
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Supreme Court dismissed the employer's appeal against the lower court's decision regarding the dismissal of employee A. The employer argued that the client required a new welder, B, because A's skills were deemed insufficient, while A claimed the dismissal was unjustified. The court ruled that the employer could not successfully rely on the client's alleged requirement to justify the termination of A's employment contract.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAs. 25 luku 14 § 2 mom: An employer cannot rely on a client's alleged requirement for a different worker to justify dismissing an employee whose skills are deemed insufficient by the employer.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
A:n ollessa lomautettuna työnantajayhtiö oli saanut hitsausta koskeneen työn. Yhtiö ei ollut kutsunut A:ta työhön katsoen hänen ammattitaitonsa riittämättömäksi. Työhön oli palkattu uusi työntekijä B.
Kysymys siitä, saiko työnantajayhtiö vasta hovioikeudessa vedota siihen, että työn tilaaja olisi edellyttänyt B:n käyttämistä hitsaustyöhön.
OK 25 luku 14 § 2 mom