Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 3709/1996 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses debt arrangement request where car loan was deemed reckless spending without special justification.

Numero d'incarto KKO 3709/1996
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the applicant's request for a debt arrangement, ruling that the 45,000 mark car loan constituted reckless debt accumulation. The applicant argued the vehicle was necessary for their electrician job and commuting, yet the court found no special circumstances justifying the debt. Consequently, the loan was classified as an obstacle to debt arrangement under the relevant statute.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

VJL 10 § 7 kohta; A debt arrangement request is denied when a loan is deemed reckless spending absent special circumstances justifying the debt.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
debt arrangement reckless spending special circumstances automobile loan employment necessity VJL 10 Supreme Court spese del veicolo a motore

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
VJL 10 § 7 kohta
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_1994_141
Supreme Court allows creditor repossession of car bought by wife for husband's essential work commute.
insurance_2008_7005-2007
Student bus subsidy allowed when school commute becomes too difficult due to childcare obligations.
admin_1984_central-finland-county__1023
Court allows car repair costs as deductible income-related expenses for a forest ranger's necessary work travel.
kko-precedent_1997_9
Supreme Court dismisses claim against city for car theft, finding sufficient security measures were taken.
appeal_1984_eastern-finland__535
Court orders compensation for vehicle damage caused by a school's employee error without requiring the victim to schedule repairs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Velallinen oli ammattikoululaisena ottanut 45 000 markan lainan käytetyn auton ostamista varten kulkeakseen autolla koulumatkoja toiseen kuntaan. Auto oli työnantajan todistuksen mukaan velalliselle tarpeellinen hänen nykyisessä sähköasentajan ammatissaan. Jo ennen auton ostoa velallinen oli yhdessä kahden muun henkilön kanssa velvoitettu yksipuolisella tuomiolla suorittamaan takausvastuita 200 000 markkaa korkoineen. Kysymys siitä, oliko auton ostoa velaksi pidettävä ilmeisesti kevytmielisenä velkaantumisena ja siten velkajärjestelyn esteenä ja oliko asiassa kuitenkin erityisiä vastasyitä, joiden johdosta velkajärjestely voitaisiin myöntää.

VJL 10 § 7 kohta