KKO 2234/1996
Generato dall'IA
Supreme Court dismisses appeal when witness testimony is excluded due to failure to hear witness in oral proceedings.
Finlandia (FI)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Supreme Court dismissed the appeal regarding the admissibility of written witness testimony because the witness could not be heard during the oral proceedings. The appellant argued that the written statement should suffice, but the court emphasized the constitutional requirement for oral confrontation in criminal trials. Consequently, the written evidence was deemed inadmissible as it violated the principle of oral proceedings.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 17 § 1 k.r.s.; Art. 17 § 2 k.r.s.: Written witness testimony is inadmissible if the witness was not heard in oral proceedings, as the principle of oral confrontation is a fundamental requirement of criminal procedure.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IA
oral proceedings principle
witness testimony admissibility
written evidence exclusion
confrontation right
criminal procedure law
prove inconcludenti
mancata prova di parzialità
allegazioni insufficientemente motivate
Disposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IAArt. 17 § 1 k.r.s.
Art. 17 § 2 k.r.s.
Decisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAkko-other_2001_1203
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding witness credibility for false statements supported by two witnesses and a guarantee.
kko-precedent_2000_71
Supreme Court allows victim's prior statement as evidence when witness refuses to testify in court.
kko-other_2006_732
Supreme Court held that lower courts must organize a main hearing in robbery cases to ensure procedural fairness.
kko-precedent_2000_62
Supreme Court allows retrial in criminal appeal when lower court misjudged witness credibility without new evidence.
kko-other_2002_188
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding failure to hold oral hearing in administrative case.
Testo completo
Kysymys näytön arvioinnista, kun todistajaa ei voitu kuulla suullisessa käsittelyssä.