Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 19/1996 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismissed claim against company B for debts of company A due to same business continuity.

Numero d'incarto KKO 19/1996
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the claim against company B regarding unpaid wages owed to employees of company A. The court found that company B was merely a continuation of company A's business under the same management, not a separate legal entity liable for prior debts. Consequently, the state was not held responsible for the debts of the predecessor company.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Section 10 of the Act on the Liability of the State for Damages; The state is not liable for debts incurred by a predecessor company when the successor entity is established solely to continue the same business under identical management.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
state liability predecessor company business continuity wage claims corporate succession rivalutazione dei salari conflitto di competenza lavoristica disciplina in materia di concorrenza

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Section 10 of the Act on the Liability of the State for Damages

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
KKO:1996:2
Supreme Court allows employer liability for wage guarantees when new company continues failed business under same control.
Generato dall'IA
ECLI:FI:KKO:2017:94
Supreme Court holds parent company liable for subsidiary's wage guarantee debt due to single owner control and operational unity.
kko-precedent_1996_2
Supreme Court allows employer liability for wage guarantees when new company continues failed business under same control.
kko-precedent_1992_58
Supreme Court allows creditor's claim against former partner where creditor knew of exit before debt arose.
appeal_1980_eastern-finland__635
Court dismissed husband's claim for unpaid dividends as work was personal sacrifice without future compensation right.
kko-other_1995_890
Shareholder's claim against accountant dismissed; funds misused contrary to shareholder's instructions in bankruptcy proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Korkeimman oikeuden tuomiossa selostetun järjestelyn tarkoituksena katsottiin olleen saman liiketoiminnan jatkaminen konkurssiin ajautuvan osakeyhtiö A:n sijasta samassa määräysvallassa olevassa osakeyhtiö B:ssä. Kysymys B:n vastuusta valtiolle A:n työntekijöille palkkaturvana maksetuista työsuhdesaatavista.

Ks. KKO:1996:2