Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 1559/1996 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court defines child abduction indicators under old Criminal Code Chapter 25 Section 2.

Numero d'incarto KKO 1559/1996
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Finland issued a decision on September 2, 1996, clarifying the specific indicators for child abduction under the Criminal Code provisions valid prior to September 1, 1995. The court addressed a question regarding the precise definition of 'child abduction' as outlined in Chapter 25, Section 2 of the Criminal Code at that time. By interpreting the statutory language, the court established the legal criteria necessary to distinguish this offense from similar crimes involving minors.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Criminal Code Chapter 25 Section 2; The court defined the specific indicators constituting the offense of child abduction under the pre-1995 Criminal Code provisions.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
child abduction indicators Criminal Code Chapter 25 pre-1995 provisions offense definition Supreme Court interpretation minors protection statutory interpretation cambiamento di dimora

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Criminal Code Chapter 25 Section 2 (as valid before 1.9.1995)
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_1995_110
Supreme Court dismisses request to return children to Switzerland, ruling the mother's move was not wrongful retention under Hague Convention.
kko-other_2005_1278
Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding child custody and guardianship decisions by the Social Board.
kko-precedent_2004_76
Supreme Court allows return of abducted children to US despite mother's claim of their objection.
kho-other_2019_5230
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal; continued residence denied due to lack of special ties despite age of majority.
kko-precedent_2003_32
Supreme Court allows return of child to US residence despite mother's claim of father's consent.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Kysymys ennen 1.9.1995 voimassa olleessa rikoslain 25 luvun 2 §:ssä tarkoitetun lapsenryöstön tunnusmerkistöstä.