Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
KKO 1517/1996 Generato dall'IA

Lease termination due to breach by third party does not automatically release lessee from damages liability.

Numero d'incarto KKO 1517/1996
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Finland ruled that the lessee remained liable for damages after the lease was terminated following the lessor's breach by the third-party seller. Although the lessee had agreed to terminate the contract with the seller and the seller failed to pay the debt, the court found no legal basis to exempt the lessee from their contractual obligations. The decision established that a lessee cannot avoid liability for lease termination damages merely because the lessor's rights were compromised by a third party's breach.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Leasing Act 1994, s. 10; Contract Act 1974, s. 2: A lessee remains liable for damages resulting from lease termination even if the lessor's claim against the third-party seller is unfulfilled, as the lessee's obligation to pay rent and compensate for breach is independent of the lessor's recourse against the seller.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
lease termination liability third party breach lessor recourse rights damages compensation leasing contract obligations soddisfacimento del credito sospensione dell'assicurazione spese del veicolo a motore

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Leasing Act 1994, s. 10
Contract Act 1974, s. 2
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rahoitusyhtiöltä auton vuokrannut oli palauttanut auton sen rahoitusyhtiölle myyneelle autoliikkeelle sopien myyjän kanssa vuokrasopimuksen purkamisesta ja siitä, että myyjä maksaa leasingsopimusvelan rahoitusyhtiölle. Myyjän laiminlyötyä suorituksen rahoitusyhtiö irtisanoi vuokrasopimuksen. Kysymys siitä, oliko vuokralleottaja velvollinen korvaamaan rahoitusyhtiölle vuokrasopimuksen ehtojen mukaisesti vuokrasopimuksen päättymisestä aiheutuneen vahingon.