Shareholder's right to intervene in company litigation dismissed as no direct legal interest established.
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Supreme Court dismissed the shareholder's application to intervene in the company's litigation regarding the dissolution of the company. The shareholder argued that the outcome would affect their investment value, but the court found no direct legal interest sufficient for intervention. Consequently, the court ruled that only parties with a direct legal stake in the specific dispute may intervene.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IALaki osakeyhtiöstä 609/1961, 10 luku; Laki oikeudenkäyntijärjestystä 731/1928, 10 luku: A shareholder lacks the right to intervene in company litigation unless they demonstrate a direct legal interest in the specific outcome of the proceedings.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IAGiurisprudenza citata
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
Kysymys osakkeenomistajan väliintulo-oikeudesta osakeyhtiötä koskevassa oikeudenkäynnissä.
Ks. KKO:1995:213