Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 5044/1995 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding criminal immunity and the duty to surrender seized vehicle and provide equivalent compensation.

Numero d'incarto KKO 5044/1995
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Finland dismissed the appellant's appeal concerning the scope of criminal immunity and the obligation to surrender a seized automobile. The appellant argued that immunity exempted them from returning the vehicle or paying compensation, while the prosecution insisted on restitution regardless of the immunity status. The court ruled that criminal immunity does not negate the civil obligation to return seized property or provide equivalent compensation, thereby upholding the lower court's decision.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Section 40 of the Criminal Procedure Act; Section 1 of the Act on the Exemption from Criminal Liability; Criminal immunity does not exempt the accused from the obligation to surrender seized property or provide equivalent compensation.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
criminal immunity scope seized property restitution equivalent compensation duty civil liability criminal Supreme Court appeal menomazione psichica allontanamento nonostante motivi di salute inesigibile malgrado lesioni salute

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Section 40 of the Criminal Procedure Act
Section 1 of the Act on the Exemption from Criminal Liability
Generato dall'IA
kko-other_2006_13
Supreme Court held that a defendant with prior convictions lacked criminal responsibility due to mental illness.
kko-precedent_1988_98
Supreme Court rejects insanity defense for intentional homicide despite pre-crime mental distress and relationship breakdown.
kko-other_1997_1381
Supreme Court held that a defendant's lack of understanding of crimes does not automatically preclude criminal liability.
kko-other_2004_2630
Supreme Court held that a defendant's lack of understanding during the crime negates criminal liability under Finnish law.
kko-other_1995_4261
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding mental state for aggravated assault where emergency defense was excessive.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Kysymys syyntakeisuudesta. Kysymys myös samanaikaisesta velvollisuudesta luovuttaa takavarikoitu auto ja suorittaa sitä vastaava korvaus.