Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 4352/1995 Generato dall'IA

Court dismisses claim that unauthorized sale and receipt of payment caused damage to the bankrupt client.

Numero d'incarto KKO 4352/1995
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the bankruptcy estate's claim for damages against the securities dealer. The dealer sold securities to a client without a new mandate after the client failed to pay the original price, then accepted payment and issued a receipt. The court ruled that the dealer's actions did not cause legal damage to the client, as the receipt was validly issued upon receipt of funds.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Korkein oikeus 10.10.1995 4352: Arvopaperilaki 1991 1 luku 10 a luku 1; Arvopaperilaki 1991 1 luku 10 a luku 2: A securities dealer who sold securities to a client without a new mandate after the client failed to pay the original price, and then accepted payment and issued a receipt, did not cause legal damage to the client, and the receipt was validly issued.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
securities dealer unauthorized sale bankruptcy estate damage claim receipt validity fiduciary duty payment acceptance azione estimatoria

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Arvopaperilaki 1991 1 luku 10 a luku 1
Arvopaperilaki 1991 1 luku 10 a luku 2
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_1989_82
Bankruptcy estate liable for continued proceedings costs if it fails to notify defendant promptly.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2026:23
Supreme Court dismisses damages claim where payment offsetting a seller's debt was recorded as capital contribution due to common error.
kko-precedent_1991_66
Supreme Court upheld lower court ruling that share sales via shell company violated prohibition on self-dealing and were void.
kko-precedent_2000_82
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; private investors are valid private prosecutors for securities fraud under Finnish law.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2021:48
Supreme Court dismisses claim allowing bankruptcy trustee to recover lost goods with similar items instead of cash.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Arvopaperinvälittäjä A, joka B:n toimeksiannosta oli ostanut B:lle arvopapereita, oli B:n jätettyä kauppahinnan maksamatta A:lle myynyt ilman B:n erillistä toimeksiantoa arvopaperit ja kuitannut kauppahinnasta ostoista aiheutuneen katesaatavansa B:ltä. Sittemmin konkurssin tehneen B:n konkurssipesä on vaatinut A:lta kauppahintaa vastaavaa vahingonkorvausta katsoen, että A oli oikeudettomasti myynyt arvopaperit eikä kuittaukselle näin ollen ollut perusteita. Kysymys siitä, oliko A:n menettelystä aiheutunut B:lle vahinkoa ja kuittausperusteista.