Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 3203/1995 Generato dall'IA

Shareholder's claim for parking fee dismissed due to unapproved and unusable parking space.

Numero d'incarto KKO 3203/1995
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the shareholder's claim for payment of a parking space fee. The shareholder argued that the assigned parking space was too narrow to use and had not approved the specific unit designated for it. The court ruled that the failure to utilize the space due to its dimensions and lack of approval did not justify the fee claim.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Section 10 of the Act on the Administration of Housing Cooperatives; A shareholder cannot claim fees for a parking space if the space is unusable due to its dimensions and the shareholder has not approved the specific unit.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
housing cooperative parking space fee unusable space shareholder approval diminutive dimensions fee claim dismissal property rights finanziamento dell'assicurazione infortuni

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Section 10 of the Act on the Administration of Housing Cooperatives
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_1990_151
Supreme Court allows appeal against conviction for parking without permission on private grounds despite city rules.
kko-precedent_2005_22
Supreme Court allows appeal against summary dismissal of challenge to apartment company repair fee allocation under general clause.
kho-other_2016_2372
Administrative court dismissed appeal; private lease dispute falls under civil jurisdiction, not administrative law.
admin_2010_rovaniemi__483
Administrative court dismisses appeal against tax authority decision regarding shared property pipe replacement costs.
kho-precedent_2014_164
Court dismisses parking fine against owner who claims others used car and he was away at work. Owner failed to prove non-involvement.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Kysymys autopaikasta asunto-osakeyhtiölle suoritettavasta maksusta, kun osakas ei ollut hyväksynyt hänen hallitsemaansa huoneistoon kuuluvaksi osoitettua autopaikkaa eikä ollut voinut käyttää autopaikkaa sen kapeuden vuoksi.