Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 2310/1995 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses fraud claim where share transfer documents show buyer received shares and assets at signing.

Numero d'incarto KKO 2310/1995
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim alleging fraud in a share sale transaction. The defendant argued that the buyer received shares and company assets at the time of signing, while the plaintiff contended the transfer was fraudulent. The court ruled that the documentary evidence of the transfer at signing negated the allegation of fraud.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Kauppakirjan 1 luku 100 luku 100; Fraud claims are dismissed where documentary evidence confirms the transfer of shares and assets occurred at the time of signing.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
fraud claim dismissal share transfer fraud company assets transfer signing evidence fraud supreme court ruling legittimo sospetto di parzialità false indicazioni su attività commerciali infrazione commessa nell'azienda
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_2012_44
Supreme Court allows retrial on price reduction claim due to unclear lower court assessment of buyer's right based on economic error.
kko-other_2001_1654
Supreme Court allows conviction of sole shareholder for accounting offense despite lack of formal board position.
admin_1999_uusimaa-county__598
Administrative court dismissed tax refund claim where dividend distribution was deemed concealed rather than real.
admin_1995_vaasa-county__443
Court dismissed tax evasion claim where company funds paid personal debts were deemed hidden dividends.
kko-other_1996_3125
Supreme Court dismisses fraud charge for selling apartment share to cohabitants without disclosure of prior debt.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A oli myynyt osakeyhtiön koko osakekannan B:lle. Kauppakirjan mukaan B oli ottanut vastaan yhtiön osakkeet ja varat allekirjoittamishetkellä. Kysymys siitä, mitä yhtiön varoihin oli kuulunut ja oliko A syyllistynyt petokseen kaupan yhteydessä.