Supreme Court dismissed claim for damages against insurer based on criminal conviction and insurance contract terms.
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for damages against the insurance company following a criminal conviction. The plaintiff argued that the insurer should pay based on the insurance contract, while the insurer contended that the criminal liability precluded civil compensation. The court ruled that the criminal conviction established the liability, but the specific contractual terms and the nature of the claim determined the outcome against the plaintiff.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAKorkein oikeuden 14 luku 8 §; The court held that a criminal conviction does not automatically bar a civil claim for damages against an insurer, but the specific contractual provisions and the nature of the liability must be examined to determine the scope of compensation.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
Kysymys rikokseen perustuvan vahingon määrästä ja sen korvaamisesta vakuutusyhtiölle, joka oli suorittanut vakuutuksen perusteella korvauksen vahingon kärsineelle.
OK 14 luku 8 §