Supreme Court dismisses appeal against conviction for conspiracy and fraud due to insufficient evidence of specific intent.

The Supreme Court of Finland dismissed the appellant's appeal against a conviction for conspiracy and fraud. The lower court found that the appellant conspired with others to defraud a victim by falsely claiming ownership of property, despite the appellant's own testimony denying knowledge of the scheme. The court upheld the conviction because the evidence sufficiently proved the existence of a common intent to deceive, which is a necessary element for the crime of conspiracy.