Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO VL:2026-229 Generato dall'IA

Consensual anal intercourse followed by manual stimulation and oral sex does not constitute rape.

Numero d'incarto KKO VL:2026-229
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Finland dismissed the prosecution's appeal regarding a charge of rape against a defendant who engaged in consensual anal intercourse with the complainant. The court found that the complainant voluntarily participated in the sexual acts, including subsequent manual stimulation and oral sex, thereby negating the essential element of non-consent required for rape. Consequently, the court ruled that the defendant's actions, while potentially violating other laws, did not meet the legal definition of rape under Finnish law.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Seksuaalilaki 1996; 1996:592: 1. Consensual sexual intercourse, including anal penetration, does not constitute rape when the complainant voluntarily participates in the act.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
consensual sexual intercourse rape definition non-consent element sexual assault voluntary participation censura formulata in modo carente fondamento dell'azione difetto di motivazione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Sexual Offences Act 1996
1996:592
Generato dall'IA
kko-leave_2026_210
Sexual intercourse without explicit consent constitutes rape; prior sexual history does not imply implied consent.
kko-leave_2025_33
Supreme Court held that the leave-to-appeal certificate description does not bind the court or limit case handling.
kko-leave_2025_27
Supreme Court allows appeal regarding use of prior statement as evidence in sexual assault case.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2026:3
Supreme Court dismisses rape charge due to insufficient evidence of non-consensual sexual contact.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2018:91
Supreme Court rejects probation for rape where victim's unconscious state due to intoxication or fatigue was exploited.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Vastaaja oli asianomistajan laskettua housunsa lyönyt asianomistajaa tämän

suostumuksella pakaroihin. Tämän jälkeen vastaaja oli hieronut käsin asianomistajan

pakaroita ja ollut tähän kaksi kertaa oraalisessa sukupuoliyhteydessä.

Kysymys siitä, oliko asianomistaja ilmaissut osallistuvansa sukupuoliyhteyksiin

vapaaehtoisesti ja oliko vastaaja syyllistynyt raiskaukseen.

Valituslupakortti sisältää kuvauksen siitä kysymyksestä, johon liittyen asiassa on

myönnetty valituslupa. Sen sisältö ei sido korkeinta oikeutta eikä rajoita asian

käsittelyä siltä osin kuin valituslupa on myönnetty.