Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO VL:2026-228 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses claim for compensation due to trial delay as criminal proceedings were already time-barred.

Numero d'incarto KKO VL:2026-228
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the applicant's claim for compensation regarding delays in the criminal proceedings. The applicant had filed requests for punishment and damages, but the prosecution and claims were ultimately rejected as time-barred. The court held that the delay-related compensation claim could not be granted because the underlying criminal case had already expired.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Rikoslaki 882/2003; Korvauslaki 1020/1974: Compensation for trial delay is not available when the underlying criminal proceedings have been time-barred and the claims rejected.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
criminal proceedings time-barred claims trial delay compensation Supreme Court procedural delay progetto di ricerca ricerca economica metodo di ricerca

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Rikoslaki 882/2003
Korvauslaki 1020/1974
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_2011_38
Supreme Court dismissed claim for compensation for excessive pre-trial investigation delay under ECHR Art 6 and 13.
kko-precedent_1996_146
Supreme Court allows compensation claim for wrongful detention when investigation is de facto terminated without charges.
insurance_2006_6967-2005
Unfinished studies due to missing exam disqualify unemployed benefit claimant as active student.
kho-precedent_2010_4
Supreme Administrative Court allows pensioner to deduct PhD research costs despite receiving tax-free research grants.
insurance_2010_2897-2009
Insurance court allows waiver of student loan recovery due to sufficient proof of actual study completion before income period.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A oli ollut asianomistajana epäiltyä kiskonnantapaista työsyrjintää koskevassa

rikosasiassa. Tutkintapyyntö oli tehty 27.2.2020. A oli esittänyt rangaistus- ja

korvausvaatimukset esitutkinnassa 29.5.2021. Esitutkinta oli päätetty 7.9.2023 ja

syyte nostettu 24.5.2024. Vastaaja oli haastettu 13.8.2024 ja tuomio annettu

6.6.2025. Syyte ja korvausvaatimukset oli hylätty vanhentuneina.

Kysymys siitä, onko asianomistajalla oikeus hyvitykseen oikeudenkäynnin viivästymisen

perusteella.

Valituslupakortti sisältää kuvauksen siitä kysymyksestä, johon liittyen asiassa on

myönnetty valituslupa. Sen sisältö ei sido korkeinta oikeutta eikä rajoita asian

käsittelyä siltä osin kuin valituslupa on myönnetty.