Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO VL:2026-226 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding lawyer's removal from property division case due to lack of diligence.

Numero d'incarto KKO VL:2026-226
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal challenging a lawyer's removal from a property division case. The client argued the lawyer failed to meet the required diligence in dividing assets between two parties. The court found no evidence that the lawyer was unsuitable under the Inheritance Act or that other grounds justified removal.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Inheritance Act Chapter 23 Section 5; The Supreme Court held that a lawyer's removal from a property division mandate requires proof of unsuitability or other statutory grounds, not merely delays in asset allocation.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
Inheritance Act property division lawyer removal diligence standard professional suitability Supreme Court appeal asset allocation insufficienza del pegno

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Inheritance Act Chapter 23 Section 5
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_1991_163
Supreme Court allows appeal against lower court decision dismissing request to remove executor from estate duty.
kko-precedent_2007_13
Supreme Court dismisses spousal maintenance claim in property division as it requires court determination, not notary.
kko-precedent_2001_56
Supreme Court allows divorce property division request when final settlement and waiver are disputed facts for the notary.
appeal_1984_helsinki__676
Statutory limitation period for transport contract claims calculated under general rules, not special provisions.
kko-precedent_1997_203
Supreme Court allows late divorce property separation claim by applying procedural time limit rules to filing date instead of service date.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Asianajaja X oli 6.11.2017 määrätty pesänjakajaksi toimittamaan omaisuuden ositus A:n

ja B:n välillä. A oli 11.9.2024 vireille tulleella hakemuksella vaatinut X:n

vapauttamista pesänjakajan tehtävästä, sillä ositus ei ollut edennyt riittävällä

joutuisuudella. Ositusta ei hakemuksen vireille tuloon mennessä ollut saatu

toimitettua.

Kysymys siitä, oliko asianajaja X perintökaaren 23 luvun 5 §:n mukaisesti toimeensa

sopimaton tai oliko asiassa muu syy vapauttaa X toimestaan.

Valituslupakortti sisältää kuvauksen siitä kysymyksestä, johon liittyen asiassa on

myönnetty valituslupa. Sen sisältö ei sido korkeinta oikeutta eikä rajoita asian

käsittelyä siltä osin kuin valituslupa on myönnetty.