Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
KKO VL:2026-218 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows consumer loan claim for 49% penalty interest when standard terms are deemed unreasonable and non-binding.

Numero d'incarto KKO VL:2026-218
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Finland allowed the consumer's appeal regarding a 49% penalty interest rate on a loan principal. The lower courts had found the standard terms regarding loan costs to be unreasonable and non-binding for the consumer. The court ruled that the specific agreement for 49% penalty interest remained valid despite the invalidity of the general cost terms, establishing that the penalty clause was not automatically voided by the unreasonableness of the broader loan conditions.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Consumer Credit Act 1998; Consumer Credit Act 1998: When standard terms are declared unreasonable and non-binding, specific contractual clauses like penalty interest rates may remain enforceable if they were separately agreed upon and not themselves unreasonable.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
consumer credit law unreasonable terms penalty interest rate non-binding clauses contractual validity Supreme Court appeal loan costs interesse corrente

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Consumer Credit Act 1998
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Kysymys siitä, oliko kuluttajaluoton pääomalle maksettava erikseen sovittua 49

prosentin suuruista viivästyskorkoa tilanteessa, jossa luoton luottokustannuksia

koskevat vakioehdot oli katsottu kohtuuttomiksi ja kuluttajaa sitomattomiksi.

Valituslupakortti sisältää kuvauksen siitä kysymyksestä, johon liittyen asiassa on

myönnetty valituslupa. Sen sisältö ei sido korkeinta oikeutta eikä rajoita asian

käsittelyä siltä osin kuin valituslupa on myönnetty.