Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO VL:2026-209 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding jurisdiction when a judge acts before a superior's retroactive order.

Numero d'incarto KKO VL:2026-209
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal challenging the lower court's jurisdiction. The lower court had tried the case with a judge and notary, but a superior later issued an order requiring the notary to act only after the case was resolved. The court held that the lower court possessed jurisdiction at the time of the trial, and the subsequent order did not retroactively invalidate the proceedings or the initial jurisdictional basis.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Käräjäoikeuslaki 1051/2004; Rikosoikeuslaki 39/1999: The jurisdiction of a lower court is determined at the time of the trial and is not invalidated by a subsequent order from a superior authority requiring a different procedural composition.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
lower court jurisdiction procedural composition retroactive order supreme court appeal criminal procedure law notaio diritto a una copertura assicurativa più estesa diritto di ottenere una decisione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Käräjäoikeuslaki 1051/2004
Rikosoikeuslaki 39/1999
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_2017_43
Supreme Court dismisses appeal because a magistrate judge lacked authority to decide a complex labor dispute case.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2023:43
Supreme Court allows retrial for gross debtor dishonesty where reasonable living costs replace business salary as the benchmark for asset transfers.
kko-precedent_2002_75
Supreme Court reverses lower courts for allowing a notary to decide a contested debt arrangement case alone.
kko-precedent_2018_62
Supreme Court allows retrial when lower court dismisses appeal without verifying if defense arguments actually affect the case outcome.
kko-precedent_2003_5
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; prior court composition invalid due to lack of authority under old law.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Käräjäoikeus oli ratkaissut rikosasian käräjätuomarin ja käräjänotaarin

kokoonpanossa. Myöhemmin kävi ilmi, että laamanni oli antanut määräyksen

käräjänotaarille toimia asiassa kokoonpanossa vasta selvästi asian ratkaisemisen

jälkeen.

Kysymys käräjäoikeuden päätösvaltaisuudesta.

Valituslupakortti sisältää kuvauksen siitä kysymyksestä, johon liittyen asiassa on

myönnetty valituslupa. Sen sisältö ei sido korkeinta oikeutta eikä rajoita asian

käsittelyä siltä osin kuin valituslupa on myönnetty.