Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO VL:2026-16 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows appeal on debt restructuring litigation costs when debtor fails to disclose or pay additional contributions.

Numero d'incarto KKO VL:2026-16
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court granted leave to appeal regarding a debtor's obligation to pay litigation costs in a debt restructuring case. The lower court had ordered the debtor to cover costs because they failed to voluntarily disclose information or make additional payments to creditors. The court decided to allow the appeal to determine if the specific statutory conditions for cost liability were met under the relevant debt restructuring law.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

61 a § of the Act on Individual Debt Arrangements; 62 § of the Act on Individual Debt Arrangements: A debtor is liable for creditors' litigation costs only if they fail to voluntarily disclose information or pay additional contributions, and this liability is not automatic without meeting these specific statutory conditions.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
individual debt arrangements litigation costs liability additional contributions voluntary disclosure creditor rights debt restructuring law Supreme Court leave fondamento dell'azione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
61 a § of the Act on Individual Debt Arrangements
62 § of the Act on Individual Debt Arrangements
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_2001_114
Supreme Court allows creditor to recover court costs when debtor did not influence enforcement outcome.
kko-precedent_2004_43
Supreme Court allows claimant to recover court costs in enforcement proceedings where settlement is permitted.
kko-precedent_2005_59
Supreme Court dismisses appeal and orders party to pay opponent's court costs after withdrawing a visitation enforcement request.
kko-precedent_2003_108
Supreme Court held defendant liable for costs despite acquittal due to post-trial lighter law application.
kko-precedent_1998_112
Supreme Court rules that a party granted free legal aid must reimburse the state but not the opponent's appeal costs if they lose the appeal.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Velkojat vaativat yksityishenkilön velkajärjestelystä annetun lain 61 a §:n

mukaisessa lisäsuoritusvelvollisuuden vahvistamista koskeneessa asiassa, että

velallinen velvoitetaan korvaamaan niiden oikeudenkäyntikulut. Käräjäoikeus

velvoitti velallisen korvaamaan hakijavelkojien oikeudenkäyntikulut sen vuoksi, että

tämä ei ollut tehnyt oma-aloitteisesti velkojille asiasta selvitystä tai maksanut

lisäsuorituksia. Velkojat olivat puhevaltansa säilyttääkseen olleet velvollisia

jättämään lisäsuoritusvelvollisuutta koskevan hakemuksen tuomioistuimelle.

Hovioikeus ei myöntänyt velalliselle jatkokäsittelylupaa.

Kysymys siitä, oliko asiassa yksityishenkilön velkajärjestelystä annetun lain 62 §:n

tarkoittama erityinen syy velvoittaa velallinen korvaamaan hakijavelkojien

oikeudenkäyntikulut.

Valituslupakortti sisältää kuvauksen siitä kysymyksestä, johon liittyen asiassa on

myönnetty valituslupa. Sen sisältö ei sido korkeinta oikeutta eikä rajoita asian

käsittelyä siltä osin kuin valituslupa on myönnetty.