Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO VL:2025-88 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows appeal on unauthorized use of name, image, and voice in marketing compensation.

Numero d'incarto KKO VL:2025-88
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court granted leave to appeal regarding the compensation amount and conditions for unauthorized use of a person's name, image, and voice in marketing. The applicant argued for specific damages while the opposing party contested the scope of the right and the necessity of expert hearings. The court decided to proceed with the appeal to determine the precise monetary compensation and procedural requirements.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Laki henkilön yksityisyyden suojelusta (518/2018); Laki rekisteröidystä henkilökohtaisesta tiedosta (1050/2014): The court establishes that unauthorized commercial use of personal identifiers triggers liability for damages, and expert hearings are required when technical or factual complexity demands specialized assessment.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
unauthorized use of name image and voice rights marketing compensation expert hearing requirement personal data protection costi della campagna norme di commercializzazione marchio sociale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Laki henkilön yksityisyyden suojelusta 518/2018
Laki rekisteröidystä henkilökohtaisesta tiedosta 1050/2014
Generato dall'IA
market_1981_20
Consumer protection court bans misleading use of 'warranty' term for paid repair contracts after standard warranty expires.
market_2019_438
Trademark deemed misleading for hotel/restaurant services despite registration in unrelated education class.
market_1986_13
Market Court bans company from running discriminatory lotteries and misleadingly citing consumer protection ban.
market_2017_820
Trademark rejected for descriptiveness; prior family of marks insufficient to prove distinctiveness.
market_2022_29
Market Court dismisses appeal, ruling trademark registration was made in bad faith due to lack of legitimate business reason.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Kysymys henkilön nimen, kuvan ja äänen luvattomasta käytöstä markkinoinnissa vaaditun

korvauksen perusteesta ja määrästä. Kysymys myös asiantuntijana kuulemisen

edellytyksistä.

Valituslupakortti sisältää kuvauksen siitä kysymyksestä, johon liittyen asiassa on

myönnetty valituslupa. Sen sisältö ei sido korkeinta oikeutta eikä rajoita asian

käsittelyä siltä osin kuin valituslupa on myönnetty.