Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO VL:2025-69 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows appeal regarding the admissibility of a lawyer's conflict of interest in shareholder buyback proceedings.

Numero d'incarto KKO VL:2025-69
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court granted leave to appeal a decision concerning the admissibility of a lawyer's appearance in shareholder buyback proceedings due to a prior client relationship. The lower court had barred the lawyer from acting as the company's agent, citing potential conflicts of interest under the Companies Act. The court decided to allow the appeal to review whether the statutory requirements for disqualification were properly met in this specific procedural context.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Osakeyhtiölain 23 luvun 1 § ja 2 §:n nojalla: Yhtiön asiamiehen esteellisyyden ja esiintymiskieltoon määräämisen edellytykset vaativat tarkastelun, jos asianajajan aiempi asiakassuhde luo ristiriidan yhtiön etujen suojaamisessa.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
shareholder buyback proceedings lawyer conflict of interest company agent disqualification Companies Act admissibility legal representation ethics premi assicurativi non pagati azione creditoria difetto di legittimazione dell'azionista

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Section 1 of Chapter 23 of the Companies Act
Section 2 of Chapter 23 of the Companies Act
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_2010_84
Supreme Court allows damages claim against deregistered company where shareholder unanimously appoints representative for proceedings.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2019:59
Supreme Court rules that a party withdrawing a civil claim must pay opponent's costs unless special circumstances exist. The court rejected the argument that parallel criminal proceedings created an exception to the withdrawal rule.
kko-other_2000_2214
Supreme Court allows VAT-exclusive repair costs as damages when defendant contests VAT liability in joint contract dispute.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2025:96
Supreme Court dismisses request for documents regarding client's legal fee liability in consumer credit dispute.
kko-precedent_2006_67
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; building defect claims fall under general jurisdiction, not real estate forum.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A oli nostanut B:tä vastaan osakeyhtiölain 23 luvun 1 §:ssä tarkoitetun osakkeiden

lunastamista koskevan kanteen sekä C Oy:tä vastaan saman luvun 2 §:ssä tarkoitetun

selvitystilaan määräämistä koskevan kanteen. B, jolla oli aikaisempi asiakassuhde

asianajajaan, oli antanut tälle toimeksiannon toimia yhtiön asiamiehenä

oikeudenkäynnissä.

Kysymys oikeudenkäyntiasiamiehen esteellisyydestä sekä esiintymiskieltoon määräämisen

edellytyksistä.

Valituslupakortti sisältää kuvauksen siitä kysymyksestä, johon liittyen asiassa on

myönnetty valituslupa. Sen sisältö ei sido korkeinta oikeutta eikä rajoita asian

käsittelyä siltä osin kuin valituslupa on myönnetty.