Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO VL:2025-53 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding prohibited bear baiting and serious hunting offense charges.

Numero d'incarto KKO VL:2025-53
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against a conviction for a serious hunting offense involving the use of prohibited bear bait. The appellant argued that the baiting method was not illegal, but the court found that hunting from a feeding station established for small game constituted prohibited baiting. Consequently, the conviction for the serious hunting offense was upheld based on the established facts.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Laki metsästyksestä 1056/1996; 1057/1996: The court held that hunting from a feeding station established for small game constitutes the use of prohibited bait, thereby establishing a serious hunting offense.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
prohibited baiting serious hunting offense feeding station bear baiting hunting regulations censura formulata in modo carente difetto di legittimazione diritto di petizione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Laki metsästyksestä 1056/1996
Laki metsästyksestä 1057/1996
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_2016_95
Supreme Court dismisses gross poaching charge; defendants took no conscious risk of bear attack.
kko-other_2016_1907
Supreme Court allows retrial for hunting offense where police authorized killing injured animal.
appeal_1986_rovaniemi__617
Hunting offense dismissed for hunting dog; penalty upheld for driving motorbike with hunting gear off-road.
kko-other_2018_1254
Supreme Court dismissed appeal; lower court wrongly denied further proceedings permit for fraud case.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2023:43
Supreme Court allows retrial for gross debtor dishonesty where reasonable living costs replace business salary as the benchmark for asset transfers.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A oli osallistunut karhun metsästykseen, joka oli aloitettu pienpetojen pyyntiä

varten perustetulta ruokintapaikalta. Kysymys siitä, oliko metsästyksessä käytetty

kiellettyä karhun houkutinta ja oliko A syyllistynyt törkeään

metsästysrikokseen.

Valituslupakortti sisältää kuvauksen siitä kysymyksestä, johon liittyen asiassa on

myönnetty valituslupa. Sen sisältö ei sido korkeinta oikeutta eikä rajoita asian

käsittelyä siltä osin kuin valituslupa on myönnetty.