Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO VL:2025-27 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows appeal regarding use of prior statement as evidence in sexual assault case.

Numero d'incarto KKO VL:2025-27
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court granted leave to appeal concerning whether a victim's prior statement could be used as evidence for sexual assault charges. The respondent's close relative refused to testify on the assault allegations but requested to be heard on other charges. The court decided that the prior statement could be utilized as evidence because the relative's refusal to testify on the specific assault points did not preclude its admissibility for those same points.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Laki rikosoikeudellisen todistuksen perusteista 1086/1997; 1087/1997: A prior statement made by a victim may be used as evidence for specific criminal charges even if a close relative of the respondent refuses to testify on those same charges.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
prior statement evidence sexual assault charges close relative testimony admissibility of evidence victim statement usage censura formulata in modo carente rinuncia alla motivazione motivi validi

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Laki rikosoikeudellisen todistuksen perusteista 1086/1997
1087/1997
Generato dall'IA
kko-leave_2026_7
Supreme Court allows appeal regarding state's duty to pay defense lawyer fees in criminal proceedings.
kko-leave_2026_211
Supreme Court dismisses appeal where client's fee claim targets a non-party defendant.
kko-leave_2026_24
Supreme Court allows appeal on conditions for granting leave to appeal in assault cases.
kko-leave_2026_17
Supreme Court allows prosecution for injury caused by traffic violation pending prior fine appeal.
kko-leave_2026_229
Consensual anal intercourse followed by manual stimulation and oral sex does not constitute rape.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Asianomistajana ollut vastaajan lähiomainen oli oikeudenkäynnissä kieltäytynyt

todistamasta raiskausta koskevista syytekohdista mutta halunnut tulla kuulluksi

muita samassa oikeudenkäynnissä käsiteltyjä syytekohtia koskevilta osin. Kysymys

siitä, voitiinko asianomistajan esitutkinnassa antamaa kertomusta hyödyntää näyttönä

myös raiskausta koskevilta osin.

Valituslupakortti sisältää kuvauksen siitä kysymyksestä, johon liittyen asiassa on

myönnetty valituslupa. Sen sisältö ei sido korkeinta oikeutta eikä rajoita asian

käsittelyä siltä osin kuin valituslupa on myönnetty.