Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
HFD:2007:44 Generato dall'IA

Court holds only net housing benefit actually paid to applicant counts as income for means-tested support.

Numero d'incarto HFD:2007:44
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Administrative Court ruled that only the net housing benefit actually paid to the applicant counts as income when granting means-tested support. The Social Insurance Institution had deducted a portion of the housing benefit monthly and paid the remainder to the applicant, treating the gross amount as income. The court clarified that the statutory definition of available income requires considering only the funds actually received by the applicant, not the gross entitlement.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Laki toimeentulotuesta 6 §, 11 § 1 mom. sekä 15 § 1 ja 2 mom.: When determining available income for social assistance, only the net amount of housing benefit actually paid to the applicant is considered, excluding any amounts withheld or deducted by the paying authority.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
means-tested support available income calculation housing benefit net amount actual payment requirement social assistance eligibility assegno per l'economia domestica asilo di famiglia prestazioni indebitamente riscosse

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Laki toimeentulotuesta 6 §
Laki toimeentulotuesta 6 §, 11 § 1 mom.
Laki toimeentulotuesta 11 § 1 mom.
Laki toimeentulotuesta 15 § 1 mom.
Laki toimeentulotuesta 15 § 2 mom.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
HFD 13.2.2007 T 293
Generato dall'IA
ECLI:FI:KHO:2023:43
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal allowing half child basic portion as expense in shared custody income support case.
insurance_2002_5389-2000
Finnish Insurance Court dismissed recovery of 308 marks as an immaterial overpayment of housing allowance.
admin_1995_mikkeli-county__858
Spousal housing allowance correctly excluded from patient fee calculation under social services fee act.
insurance_2011_6713-2009
Insurance court dismissed appeal; waiver of recovery requires futile collection or disproportionate costs.
insurance_2020_2361-2020
Court allows housing support claim by overturning social security board decision regarding rent paid by municipality.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Toimeentulotukea myönnettäessä tuloina otetaan huomioon henkilön ja perheenjäsenten käytettävissä olevat tulot. Kansaneläkelaitos oli myöntänyt toimeentulotuen hakijan perheelle asumistukea, josta se kuitenkin kuukausittain suoritti takaisinperintää ja maksoi erotuksen toimeentulotuen hakijalle. Toimeentulotukea myönnettäessä käytettävissä olevina tuloina tuli ottaa huomioon vain hakijalle tosiasiassa maksetun asumistuen määrä.

Laki toimeentulotuesta 6 §, 11 § 1 mom. sekä 15 § 1 ja 2 mom.

Vertaa KHO 13.2.2007 T 293.

Kort referat på svenska

---

[SV]

Vid beviljande av utkomststöd beaktas sökandens och familjemedlemmarnas disponibla inkomster. Folkpensionsanstalten hade beviljat sökandens familj bostadsbidrag, av vilket anstalten dock varje månad innehöll en del som återkrav och betalade den återstående delen till utkomststödssökanden. Som inkomst vid beviljande av utkomststöd skulle beaktas endast det bostadsbidragsbelopp som faktiskt utbetalades till sökanden.

Lag om utkomststöd 6 §, 11 § 1 mom. samt 15 § 1 och 2 mom.

Jfr HFD 13.2.2007 liggare 293