Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KHO:2006:22 Generato dall'IA

Student loan interest not deductible from means-tested benefit supplement due to income inclusion during study months.

Numero d'incarto KHO:2006:22
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the applicant's appeal regarding the inclusion of student loan interest in means-tested benefit calculations. The court found that since student loan payments were already counted as available income during study months, the interest could not be classified as a necessary expense requiring full coverage by the benefit supplement. Consequently, the court ruled that the applicant failed to demonstrate why the interest was essential for securing their livelihood under the specific circumstances.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Laki toimeentulotuesta 1, 2, 6, 7 ja 15 §; Asetus toimeentulotuesta 1 § 1 mom. 4 kohta; Opintotukilaki 2 §: Student loan interest is not a necessary expense deductible from means-tested benefit supplements when loan payments are already included as income during study periods.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
student loan interest means-tested benefits income inclusion necessary expenses benefit supplement financial assistance administrative appeal sussidio per la frequentazione di corsi

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Laki toimeentulotuesta 1, 2, 6, 7 ja 15 §
Laki toimeentulotuesta 1, 2, 6, 7 ja 15 §
Asetus toimeentulotuesta 1 § 1 mom. 4 kohta
Asetus toimeentulotuesta 1 § 1 mom. 4 kohta
Opintotukilaki 2 §
Generato dall'IA
kho-precedent_2005_20
Student's social assistance claim dismissed as income from study support exceeds means-tested benefit threshold.
insurance_2010_3938-2009
Insurance Court rejects applying administrative delay law to student loan interest rate increases.
kho-precedent_2007_69
Supreme Administrative Court allows claimant's appeal, ruling student loan income cannot be counted for welfare benefits due to migrant status and school success.
insurance_1999_1347-1999
Long-term unemployed student's self-study support equated to interest subsidy under employment training rules.
admin_1997_uusimaa-county__421
Court holds daily maintenance allowance for adult vocational training is not income for benefit calculation.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Opintolainan korkoja ei voitu pitää toimeentulotuen lisäosalla korvattavina tarpeellisina menoina sillä perusteella, että opintolaina oli opiskelukuukausina luettu toimeentulotuen tarvetta arvioitaessa käytettävissä olevaksi tuloksi. Koska asiassa ei ollut ilmennyt sellaisia seikkoja, joiden vuoksi korkojen kattaminen kokonaan toimeentulotuen lisäosalla olisi ollut tässä tapauksessa toimeentulon turvaamiseksi tarpeen, korkojen katsomista lisäosalla korvattaviksi menoiksi koskeva valitus hylättiin.

Laki toimeentulotuesta 1, 2, 6, 7 ja 15 §

Asetus toimeentulotuesta 1 § 1 mom. 4 kohta

Opintotukilaki 2 §

Kort referat på svenska

---

[SV]

Att ett studielån vid bedömningen av utkomststödsbehovet hade betraktats som disponibel inkomst under studiemånaderna medförde inte att räntorna på studielånet kunde betraktas som sådana nödvändiga utgifter som skulle täckas med utkomststödets tilläggsdel. Eftersom i ärendet inte hade framkommit omständigheter som skulle ha inneburit att utkomsten i detta fall inte skulle ha kunnat tryggas om inte hela utgiften för studielånsräntorna täcktes med utkomststödets tilläggsdel, förkastades besvären, i vilka yrkades att räntorna skulle betraktas som en utgift som skulle täckas med utkomststödets tilläggsdel.