Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
HFD:2006:12 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal against planning decision using administrative procedure law exclusion clause.

Numero d'incarto HFD:2006:12
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the appellants' appeal against the Administrative Court's decision to revoke a municipal zoning plan designating their land for small housing. The appellants argued against the planning decision, but the Administrative Court had already nullified the specific area in question based on procedural grounds. The Court upheld this decision by applying the exclusion clause of the Administrative Procedure Act, which bars appeals against decisions made under specific statutory provisions.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Administrative Procedure Act s. 33; Administrative Procedure Act s. 34 (1); Administrative Procedure Act s. 63 (1) 1: Appeals against decisions made pursuant to specific statutory provisions are inadmissible under the exclusion clause of the Administrative Procedure Act.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
administrative procedure law exclusion clause inadmissible appeal zoning plan small housing area potere discrezionale dell'amministrazione amministrazione sovrana difetto di legittimazione del ministero pubblico

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Land Use and Building Act s. 191 (3)
Administrative Procedure Act s. 33
Administrative Procedure Act s. 34 (1)
Administrative Procedure Act s. 63 (1) 1

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
HFD:2003:102
Supreme Court dismisses landowner's appeal when zoning plan is partially revoked by lower court.
HFD 22.3.2006 T 639
Generato dall'IA
kho-other_2016_5516
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses wind farm planning appeal regarding lack of direct impact on residents' rights.
kho-precedent_2003_102
Supreme Court dismisses landowner's appeal when zoning plan is partially revoked by lower court.
admin_2017_aland__28
Administrative court dismissed appeal as municipal planning decision was not legally appealable under Åland laws.
kho-other_2016_3695
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeals against a coastal zone plan approval regarding badger habitat protection.
kho-other_2017_6262
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal against zoning plan approval due to procedural compliance and lack of new grounds.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Kaupunginvaltuuston päätöksellä hyväksytyssä yleiskaavassa A:n ja B:n omistamalle C:n tilalle oli osoitettu asuinpientalojen alue (AP). Hallinto-oikeus oli eräiden maanomistajien valituksesta kumonnut kaupunginvaltuuston päätöksen mainitun AP-alueen osalta. Korkein hallinto-oikeus jätti maankäyttö- ja rakennuslain 191 §:n 3 momentin nojalla A:n ja B:n valituksen hallinto-oikeuden päätöksestä tutkimatta. Äänestys 6-2.

Maankäyttö- ja rakennuslaki 191 § 3 mom.

Hallintolainkäyttölaki 33 §, 34 § 1 mom ja 63 § 1 mom. 1 kohta

Ks. KHO:2003:102 ja KHO 22.3.2006 T 639.

Kort referat på svenska

---

[SV]

Stadfullmäktige hade antagit en generalplan i vilken ett område av A:s och B:s fastighet C anvisades för ett bostadsområde dominerat av småhus (AP). På besvär av vissa andra markägare upphävde förvaltningsdomstolen stadsfullmäktiges beslut till den del som beslutet gällde nämnda AP-område. A och B överklagade förvaltningsdomstolens beslut till högsta förvaltningsdomstolen, som avvisades besvären med stöd av 191 § 3 mom. i markanvändnings- och bygglagen. Omröstning 6-2.

Se HFD:2003:102 och HFD 22.3.2006 liggare 639.