Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
HFD:2006:10 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal regarding child custody and visitation rights under Finnish Basic Law and Family Law.

Numero d'incarto HFD:2006:10
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the applicant's appeal concerning the termination of visitation rights and custody arrangements. The applicant argued that the lower court failed to adequately consider the child's best interests and the impact of the custody change on the relationship with the other parent. The court upheld the decision, ruling that the lower court correctly applied the statutory requirements for modifying custody and visitation under the relevant family law provisions.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Laki lapsen huollosta ja tapaamisoikeudesta 7 § 2 kohta ja 9 § 1 mom. 2 kohta; The court held that modifications to custody and visitation rights must strictly adhere to the child's best interests as the primary guiding principle.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
child custody modification visitation rights termination best interests of child family law appeal Supreme Administrative Court diritto all'istruzione primaria diritto di passo necessario provvedimento nell'età prescolastica

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Laki lapsen huollosta ja tapaamisoikeudesta 7 § 2 kohta
Laki lapsen huollosta ja tapaamisoikeudesta 7 § 2 kohta ja 9 § 1 mom.
Laki lapsen huollosta ja tapaamisoikeudesta 9 § 1 mom. 2 kohta
Perusopetuslaki 4 § 1 mom.
Perusopetuslaki 4 § 1 mom., 6 § 1 mom., 28 § 1 mom.
Perusopetuslaki 6 § 1 mom.
Perusopetuslaki 28 § 1 mom.
Perusopetuslaki 32 § 1 mom.
Perusopetuslaki 32 § 3 mom.
Generato dall'IA
admin_2000_turku__98
Municipality not liable for student's home-to-school travel costs when home-to-school distance exceeds five kilometers.
kho-precedent_2016_51
School trip measured from home to school gate; partial transport allowed under basic education law.
kho-other_2020_2869
Supreme Administrative Court allows appeal; school travel aid must cover all necessary parent trips including return journeys.
admin_2004_oulu__555
Administrative court dismisses appeal claiming home to preschool commute is too dangerous for a six-year-old child.
insurance_2008_7005-2007
Student bus subsidy allowed when school commute becomes too difficult due to childcare obligations.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Suomen perustuslaki 16 § 1 mom.

Perusopetuslaki 4 § 1 mom., 6 § 1 mom., 28 § 1 mom. sekä 32 § 1 ja 3 mom.

Kunnan sivistystoimen johtosääntö

Laki lapsen huollosta ja tapaamisoikeudesta 7 § 2 kohta ja 9 § 1 mom. 2 kohta

Kort referat på svenska