Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KHO:2004:92 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal against building permit decision regarding land use and planning law violations.

Numero d'incarto KHO:2004:92
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the applicant's appeal against the Regional Administrative Court's confirmation of a building permit. The applicant argued that the permit violated land use and planning laws by failing to consider necessary environmental and traffic impacts. The court held that the lower court correctly applied the relevant statutes and found no legal error in the permit's issuance.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Maankäyttö- ja rakennuslaki 171 §; 172 §: The Supreme Administrative Court reviews building permit decisions for compliance with land use and planning laws, affirming permits where the lower court properly assessed statutory requirements and rejected appeals lacking legal merit.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
building permit decision land use law planning law violation administrative appeal Supreme Administrative Court environmental impact traffic considerations ostacoli allo sviluppo

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Maankäyttö- ja rakennuslaki 171 § 1 mom.
Maankäyttö- ja rakennuslaki 171 § 1 mom., 171 § 2 mom.
Maankäyttö- ja rakennuslaki 171 § 2 mom. 2 kohta
Maankäyttö- ja rakennuslaki 171 § 3 mom.
Maankäyttö- ja rakennuslaki 172 §
Maankäyttö- ja rakennuslaki 214 §
Generato dall'IA
admin_2016_aland__73
Administrative court dismissed building permit deviation due to non-fulfilled planning area requirements and building code limits.
kho-other_2016_5427
Appeal dismissed; minor residential building on sauna plot deemed not to harm zoning plan implementation.
kho-other_2016_3752
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal; planning deviation violates equal treatment and causes harm to plan implementation.
kho-other_2016_416
Supreme Administrative Court allows appeal against ELY rejection, ruling that a coastal zone plan exists for the sauna building site.
kho-precedent_2005_8
Building permit required for sauna on coast zone without plan; environmental center has jurisdiction.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Maankäyttö- ja rakennuslaki 171 § 1 mom., 171 § 2 mom. 2 kohta, 171 § 3 mom., 172 § ja 214 §

Kort referat på svenska