Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KHO:2000:23 Generato dall'IA

Separate appeal against enforcement order requires same permission rules as main case appeal.

Numero d'incarto KHO:2000:23
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Administrative Court declared an appeal against a separate order refusing enforcement inadmissible because it lacked permission. The lower court had ruled on the enforcement refusal while leaving the main social assistance case pending, treating the appeal as a distinct procedural step. The court held that such separate appeals must follow the exact same sequence and limitations as appeals against the primary decision, thereby necessitating a prior permission to appeal.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Hallintolainkäyttölaki 79 § 1 mom. 4 kohta; Sosiaalihuoltolaki 49 § 2 mom.: An appeal against a separate decision refusing enforcement of a social assistance ruling is subject to the same permission requirements and procedural limits as an appeal against the main decision itself.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
separate appeal procedure enforcement refusal order permission to appeal requirement social assistance case procedural limitations tutela del processo decisionale lacuna giurisdizionale questioni processuali

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Hallintolainkäyttölaki 79 § 1 mom. 4 kohta
Hallintolainkäyttölaki 79 § 1 mom. 4 kohta
Sosiaalihuoltolaki 49 § 2 mom.
Sosiaalihuoltolaki 49 § 2 mom.
Generato dall'IA
admin_1989_turku-and-pori-county__589
Administrative court dismissed appeal, ruling vacation pay decisions require appeal to the agricultural committee, not the county court.
kho-precedent_1998_17
Supreme Administrative Court quashes lower court decision due to conflicting interpretations of permit requirements.
admin_1995_uusimaa-county__1375
Administrative court allows appeal on land value despite prior appeal on inheritance tax due to distinct legal issues.
admin_1995_central-finland-county__740
Administrative court dismissed appeal by transferring fire inspection order to municipal board under municipal law.
admin_1989_turku-and-pori-county__141
Shareholder's standing to appeal a building permit granted to the company for a sauna.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Lääninoikeus oli ratkaissut toimeentulotukiasiassa esitetyn perusturvalautakunnan päätöksen täytäntöönpanon kieltämistä koskevan hakemuksen erillisellä päätöksellä pääasian jäädessä edelleen lääninoikeuteen vireille. Korkein hallinto-oikeus katsoi, että haettaessa täytäntöönpanon kieltämistä koskevaan päätökseen erikseen muutosta, tämä tapahtui samassa järjestyksessä ja samoin rajoituksin kuin pääasian ratkaisuun muutosta haettaessa. Valittaminen edellytti siten valitusluvan myöntämistä.

Hallintolainkäyttölaki 79 § 1 mom. 4 kohta

Sosiaalihuoltolaki 49 § 2 mom.