Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KHO:1999:7 Generato dall'IA

VAT input tax deduction denied when cars and parts exported after work performed in Finland.

Numero d'incarto KHO:1999:7
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the taxpayer's claim for a VAT input tax deduction. The company performed work in Finland on parts imported from a foreign affiliate, but the resulting cars and parts were subsequently exported to Sweden. The court held that the deduction was not allowed because the taxable supply of the cars occurred in Sweden, not Finland.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Arvonlisäverolaki 67 b §; The right to deduct input VAT is denied when the taxable supply of the goods or services occurs in a foreign country, thereby breaking the chain of deduction in the country where the work was performed.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
value added tax input tax deduction export of goods place of supply cross-border transactions VAT chain foreign affiliate valutazione del paese d'origine

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Arvonlisäverolaki 67 b §
Arvonlisäverolaki 67 b §
Generato dall'IA
admin_2000_helsinki__1402
Court allows vehicle tax appeal when EU law prohibits discriminatory foreign storage costs.
kko-precedent_2013_58
Supreme Court dismisses VAT claim for car tax VAT as EU law violation was not sufficiently obvious at the time.
kho-precedent_2006_75
Court held dividend distribution rules apply to share premium return, granting Finland taxing rights.
kho-precedent_2008_23
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal; source tax applies to full dividend despite low yield under EU law.
kho-precedent_2004_104
Court allows car tax reduction for relocating individuals if it does not create prohibited discrimination.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Suomalainen yhtiö A kokosi ruotsalaisen sisaryhtiön B omistamista tänne tuoduista osista etu- ja takapuskureita, jotka kiinnitettiin Suomessa suomalaisen yhtiön C valmistamiin autoihin. Yhtiö C vei autot pois Suomesta. Kun yhtiö B käytti työsuoritusten ostoissa Ruotsissa annettua arvonlisäverotunnistetta ja kun autot, joihin työsuoritusten tuloksena syntyneet puskurit kiinnitettiin, vietiin Suomesta niitä täällä käyttämättä, työsuoritukset oli myyty ostajan

arvonlisäverotunnisteen antaneessa maassa eli Ruotsissa. Ennakkotieto ajalle 1.1.1996-31.12.1997. Äänestys 5-3.

Arvonlisäverolaki 67 b §