Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KHO:1999:38 Generato dall'IA

Finnish agricultural investment support for drainage rejected due to applicant's significant wealth making aid inappropriate.

Numero d'incarto KHO:1999:38
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the applicant's claim for agricultural investment support regarding a drainage project. The court found that the applicants' substantial wealth, evidenced by tax documents, rendered the financial aid inappropriate under the law. Consequently, the support was denied because the applicants' economic status conflicted with the requirement for the aid to be a reasonable measure.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Maaseutuelinkeinolaki 1990:1295 1 §, 8 § 1 momentti, 15a § 1 momentin 1 kohta ja 2 momentti, 32 § ja 54 §:n nojalla maatalouden investointituki voidaan hylätä, jos hakijan huomattava varallisuus osoittaa tukemisen ei olevan tarkoituksenmukaista.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
agricultural investment support drainage project funding applicant wealth assessment financial aid appropriateness Supreme Administrative Court Maaseutuelinkeinolaki substantial assets disqualification garanzia contro i rischi dell'investimento

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Maaseutuelinkeinolaki (1295/1990, muutettu 1304/1994, 1342/1996) 1 §
Maaseutuelinkeinolaki (1295/1990, muutettu 1304/1994, 1342/1996) 1 §, 8 § 1 momentti, 15a §:n 1 momentin 1 kohta ja 2 momentti, 32 § ja 54 § sekä lain 1342/1996 voimaantulosäännökset.
Maaseutuelinkeinolaki 1990:1295 8 § 1 momentti
Maaseutuelinkeinolaki 1990:1295 15a § 1 momentin 1 kohta ja 2 momentti
Maaseutuelinkeinolaki 1990:1295 32 §
Maaseutuelinkeinolaki 1990:1295 54 §
Laki 1342/1996 voimaantulosäännökset
Generato dall'IA
kho-precedent_1998_78
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed compensation claim for permanent natural damage based on forestry law provisions.
admin_2024_hameenlinna__1766
Administrative court dismissed appeal against state guarantee decision for farm loan repayment readiness.
kko-precedent_2000_26
Supreme Court allows heir as farm successor based on practical farming experience, rejecting age and residence as barriers.
kho-precedent_2009_102
Court dismisses appeal against public procurement decision excluding a company due to lack of statutory exclusion grounds.
admin_1990_lapland-county__667
Tax deduction claim allowed for new tax year despite prior rejection due to missing evidence.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Takautuva, kokonaan kansallisista varoista rahoitettava maatalouden investointituki salaojitushanketta varten voitiin hylätä sillä perusteella, että henkilöt olivat taloudelliselta asemaltaan sellaisia, että heidän tukemistaan ei voitu pitää tarkoituksenmukaisena, kun otettiin huomioon verotusasiakirjoista ilmenevä hakijoiden huomattava varallisuus.

Maaseutuelinkeinolaki (1295/1990, muutettu 1304/1994, 1342/1996) 1 §, 8 § 1 momentti, 15a §:n 1 momentin 1 kohta ja 2 momentti, 32 § ja 54 § sekä lain 1342/1996 voimaantulosäännökset.