Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KHO:1999:3 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Administrative Court held that a zoning plan is not a regulation under the Planning Act and cannot be bypassed.

Numero d'incarto KHO:1999:3
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the applicant's request to have a zoning plan provision inapplicable under the Planning Act. The applicant sought to place a grocery store on an industrial plot, arguing the zoning rule prohibiting such use violated the law. The court ruled that zoning plans do not fall under the specific exemption clause of the Planning Act, meaning the planning authority was legally bound to reject the construction permit based on the zoning regulations.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Planning Act s. 92 § 2 mom.; Planning Act s. 42 § 1 mom.; A zoning plan is not a regulation subject to the inapplicability clause of the Planning Act, and construction permits must be denied if they violate binding zoning regulations.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
zoning plan interpretation Planning Act exemption construction permit denial industrial zone usage administrative review scope servitù di limitazione di costruzione onere della licenza edilizia legittimazione a contestare licenza

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Planning Act s. 92 § 2 mom.
Planning Act s. 42 § 1 mom.
Building Decree s. 53 § 1 mom.
Generato dall'IA
admin_2026_helsinki__4926
Temporary construction permit without planning variance approval is invalid under construction act provisions.
admin_2007_helsinki__1820
Planning authority decision revoked for violating planning act and causing unequal treatment of landowners.
ECLI:FI:KHO:2019:44
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal against zoning plan approval due to conditional road access requirements.
ECLI:FI:KHO:2020:52
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal regarding partial planning scheme obsolescence under Finnish Planning Act. Court upheld city's power to declare specific plot obsolete. Partial obsolescence of planning scheme is permitted under Planning Act. City may declare specific plot obsolete under Planning Act. Partial obsolescence of planning scheme is permitted under Planning Act.
kho-precedent_2013_87
Supreme Court allows appeal dismissing city council's beach zoning decision as legally invalid due to conflicting general plan guidance.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rakennuslupahakemus sisälsi päivittäistavaramyymälän sijoittamisen tontille, joka asemakaavassa oli teollisuus- ja varastorakennusten korttelialuetta (T). Tonttia koski kaavamääräys, jonka mukaan 30 prosenttia rakennusalalle sallitusta kerrosalasta saatiin käyttää liike- ja toimistotiloja varten. Lainvoimaisen kaavamääräyksen mukaan korttelialueelle ei saanut sijoittaa päivittäistavaramyymälää. Rakennuslautakunta hylkäsi rakennuslupahakemuksen asemakaavan vastaisena.

Luvanhakija vaati, että päivittäistavaramyymälän sijoittamisen kieltävä kaavamääräys tuli lainvastaisena jättää hallitusmuodon 92 §:n 2 momentin nojalla soveltamatta. Korkein hallinto-oikeus katsoi, että asemakaava ei ole hallitusmuodon 92 §:n 2 momentissa tarkoitettu säädös. Rakennuslautakunta ei siten ollut voinut mainitun lainkohdan nojalla jättää soveltamatta kaavamääräystä, vaan sen oli tullut hylätä rakennuslupahakemus asemakaavan vastaisena.

Hallitusmuoto 92 § 2 mom.

Rakennuslaki 42 § 1 mom.

Rakennusasetus 53 § 1 mom.