Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KHO:1999:23 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Administrative Court dismissed owners' claim for easement to keep existing water and sewer pipes on neighboring land.

Numero d'incarto KHO:1999:23
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the owners of Plot A's request to establish a construction law easement to maintain water and sewer pipes on Plot B. Although the pipes were originally installed legally in 1961 and later renewed, no easement was formally established when the plots were separated in 1979 or 1984. The court ruled that the lack of a formal easement registration at the time of division precluded the current owners from claiming the right to use the land for the pipes.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Rakennuslain 133 § 1 ja 3 mom; An easement for the maintenance of existing utility pipes on neighboring land requires formal establishment at the time of property division and cannot be claimed retroactively by subsequent owners.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
construction law easement utility pipe maintenance property division easement registration neighboring land rights retroactive claim Supreme Administrative Court motivi protetti

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Rakennuslain 133 § 1 mom
Rakennuslain 133 § 3 mom
Generato dall'IA
kko-other_2003_1269
Supreme Court rules that a new landowner must allow existing utility pipes on their land if no official easement was granted.
kko-precedent_2003_106
Supreme Court allows registry to add a wall easement burden to a plot after it was registered as land.
admin_2010_helsinki__1160
Administrative court dismissed permit request for water pipes on private land due to existing planning scheme and lack of lost right.
kho-precedent_2015_1
Finnish Supreme Administrative Court allows tax-free gain from selling half a plot where the taxpayer lived for years, despite a new building existing. The court ruled that the original residence's location qualifies for tax exemption under the Income Tax Act. The decision clarifies that the existence of a replacement building does not negate the tax-free status of the land portion sold.
admin_2012_turku__89
Administrative court dismissed claim that undeveloped lots qualify for higher property tax under zoning plan.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Tontin A omistajat hakivat rakennuslain 133 §:n mukaista oikeutta omistamaansa tonttia palvelevien vesi- ja viemärijohtojen pysyttämiseksi nykyisellä paikallaan tontin B alueella. Alueen aiempi omistaja oli vuonna 1961 sijoittanut johdot laillisesti paikalle tonttien ollessa samaa kiinteistöä. Tonttien muodostamisen yhteydessä vuosina 1979 ja 1984 tai myöhemminkään ei ollut perustettu kiinteistörasitetta. Johdot oli uusittu vuonna 1985, kun ne olivat vaurioituneet tontilla B suoritettujen rakennustöiden yhteydessä. Tämän jälkeen sekä tontin A että tontin B omistajat olivat vaihtuneet. Kauppakirjassa, jolla tontin B omistajat olivat vuonna 1988 ostaneet tontin, oli maininta johdoista ja niiden likimääräisestä sijainnista. Tontin A omistajat eivät olleet hakemansa oikeuden tarpeessa.

Rakennuslaki 133 § 1 ja 3 mom