Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KHO:1998:71 Generato dall'IA

Shareholder denied hidden dividend due to lack of statutory disclosure procedure for dormant company assets.

Numero d'incarto KHO:1998:71
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the shareholder's claim for a hidden dividend regarding assets held in a dormant company's bank account. The court found that the assets were distributed without the mandatory disclosure procedure required by the Companies Act, which is a prerequisite for recognizing a hidden dividend under the Income Tax Act. Consequently, the tax authority's refusal to grant the hidden dividend status was upheld as legally correct.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Verotuslain 57 § 2 momentti; Osakeyhtiölain selvitysmenettely: A hidden dividend under the Income Tax Act is not recognized if the underlying asset distribution from a dormant company was made without complying with the mandatory disclosure procedure of the Companies Act.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
hidden dividend dormant company disclosure procedure tax liability asset distribution shareholder claim Companies Act bancarotta fraudolenta

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Verotuslaki 57 § 2 momentti
Osakeyhtiölaki
Generato dall'IA
admin_2012_vaasa__396
Administrative court held a purchased limited partnership not dissolved for tax purposes when an outsider continues business alone.
kho-precedent_2001_63
Finnish Supreme Administrative Court ruled MBA costs are business expenses, not salary, exempting employer from advance tax withholding.
admin_2014_eastern-finland__5482
Tax court rules that a savings bank changing to a foundation during a business transfer is not dissolved for tax purposes under section 24 of the Income Tax Act.
kko-other_2002_3264
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding tax evasion charge under specific criminal law provision.
kho-precedent_2004_82
Preparation of tax assessment did not create bias for tax appeal board member under administrative procedure law.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Osakeyhtiön osakas ei saanut verotuslain 57 §:n 2 momentissa tarkoitettua peiteltyä osinkoa, kun noin kymmenen vuotta aiemmin toimintansa lopettaneen ja velattoman osakeyhtiön pankkitilillä olleet varat jaettiin osakeyhtiölaissa säädettyä selvitysmenettelyä tekemättä. Verovuosi 1995. Äänestys 4-1.