Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KHO:1998:15 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Administrative Court quashed a decision due to a conflict of interest where a committee member signed a relevant statement.

Numero d'incarto KHO:1998:15
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Administrative Court quashed the decision of the Drug Price Committee because a member who signed a relevant statement from the Social Insurance Institution was deemed conflicted under the Administrative Procedure Act. The court held that this procedural error rendered the member's participation in the case handling invalid. Consequently, the case was remitted to the committee for a new examination.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Hallintomenettelylain 10 § 1 mom 6 k; A public body member who signs a statement relevant to the case they are hearing is considered conflicted and must recuse themselves, rendering their participation invalid if they do not.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
conflict of interest administrative procedure act recusal requirement procedural error remittal of case drug price committee social insurance institution politica dei prezzi

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Hallintomenettelylain 10 § 1 mom 6 k
Hallintomenettelylain 11 §
Generato dall'IA
insurance_1999_8771-1997
Insurance court dismissed appeal as social security board violated fair trial rights by denying hearing.
market_2009_594
Market Court dismisses bid protest but orders public authority to pay client's court costs due to procedural error.
ECLI:FI:KHO:2018:72
Supreme Administrative Court quashes price board decision for failing to justify wholesale price rejection with sufficient reasoning.
kho-other_2016_4429
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeals against a municipal council decision approving a tunnel construction contract.
admin_2001_kuopio__595
Administrative court quashes decision for failing to hear a third-party employee affected by a correction request.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Lääkekorvauslautakunnassa (nykyään lääkkeiden hintalautakunta) päätöksentekoon lautakunnan jäsenenä oli osallistunut henkilö, joka oli allekirjoittanut lautakunnalle samasta asiasta annetun kansaneläkelaitoksen lausunnon. Huomioon ottaen lausunnon merkitys asiaa ratkaistaessa ja henkilön asema lausunnon antajana, hänen oli katsottava olleen hallintomenettelylain 10 §:n 1 momentin 6 kohdassa tarkoitetulla tavalla esteellinen osallistumaan lautakunnan jäsenenä asian käsittelyyn. Kun asian käsittelyssä oli näin ollen tapahtunut menettelyvirhe, korkein hallinto-oikeus kumosi lautakunnan päätöksen ja siirsi asian lääkkeiden hintalautakunnalle uudelleen käsiteltäväksi.

HallintomenettelyL 10 §

HallintomenettelyL 11 §