Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KHO:1997:79 Generato dall'IA

Finnish Supreme Administrative Court allows corporate group loan deduction as business expense under tax law.

Numero d'incarto KHO:1997:79
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The court allowed the deduction of a loan provided by a subsidiary to a parent company within a corporate group. The taxpayer argued that the loan, matching the amount of an internal grant, constituted a business expense under the Tax Act. The court ruled that the transaction was genuine and performed for business purposes, thereby permitting the deduction.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

2 § of the Act on Corporate Group Loans; A loan between companies in a corporate group is deductible as a business expense if it is granted for business purposes and meets the statutory requirements.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
corporate group loans tax deduction business expense Finnish tax law internal transfers consorzio concorso di responsabilità vantaggio concesso ad un'impresa

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
2 § of the Act on Corporate Group Loans
Generato dall'IA
ECLI:FI:KHO:2023:32
Supreme Administrative Court allows appeal to prevent double taxation by requiring loss recognition for group aid deduction.
admin_1993_uusimaa-county__312
Court allows parent company's consortium subsidy deduction after ruling subsidiary continued business operations.
ECLI:FI:KHO:2022:128
VAT deduction denied for parent company when financing and insurance services are separate from taxable consulting services.
kho-precedent_2014_33
Supreme Administrative Court allows tax adjustment removal where transfer price evidence was unreliable but substance value was used.
admin_2011_helsinki__74
Administrative court denied loss deduction for intercompany loan after corporate ownership change, ruling group status requirements not met.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

B yhtiön, jonka toimialana oli osakkuusyritysten konsultointi, osakekannasta omisti yli 90 % konsernin rahoitusyhtiönä toiminut emoyhtiö C. Yhtiö B omisti vastaavasti yli 90 % tytäryhtiö A:n osakekannasta. Verovuoden aikana oli yhtiö B saanut tytäryhtiö A:lta 3.000.000 markkaa konserniavustusta, josta se oli välittänyt 2.500.000 markkaa edelleen emoyhtiö C:lle. Samalla kun yhtiö B oli saanut yhtiö A:lta tuon konserniavustuksen, oli yhtiö B myöntänyt yhtiö A:lle samansuuruisen lainan. Kun kaikki yhtiöt A, B ja C olivat verovuoden aikana harjoittaneet liiketoimintaa, katsottiin konserniavustus annetuksi konserniavustuksesta verotuksessa annetun lain 2 §:n mukaisesti liiketoimintaa varten ja siten vähennyskelpoiseksi liikemenoksi. Verovuosi_1993. D:3026/2/96